When highly visible religious leaders have a lapse in character and their moral failure is exposed to the general public, we are often quick to publicize and circulate the news to our personal gossip circles and local street-news committees. However, when the same leaders demonstrate levels of high moral character, contrition, and/or personal transformation, we are not as apt to spread the news. Generally, I think the discrepancy between how fast good and bad news about religious leaders is disseminated can be attributed to our culture’s fascination with the sensational and scandalous aspects of public life. Furthermore, when the scandalous news is surrounding a highly visible preacher the fascination is compounded with questions related to issues like pastoral redemption, congregational forgiveness, suitability for ministry, sin, adultery, preying preachers, and sanctified freakiness etc.
In so many ways the public scenario that I’ve just described is exactly what happened to Baltimore based mega church pastor and TV preacher Jamal Harrison-Bryant.
The Allegations of Infidelity
During the summer of 2007 accusations of an affair began to surface about Pastor Bryant and an alleged 17 year old church member. These accusations reached a culminating point in the winter of 2008, when the Baltimore Sun newspaper published an article about an ensuing divorce between Pastor Bryant and his wife Giselle as a result of Bryant’s alleged infidelities. The article incited an online media firestorm on various blogs and gossip sites, as countless individuals far and wide began to express their feelings of support and condemnation, for and against, the embattled Reverend Bryant. This exchange of rumors and accusations, defamation and affirmation concerning Pastor Bryant’s alleged moral failings continued for several months without any in-depth public address, statement, and/or interview from Bryant.
Jamal Bryant Responds To Rumors and Accusations
Fast forward 2 ½ years from 2008 to now, Pastor Bryant and Giselle are officially divorced, he is still pastor of Empowerment Temple, he continues to preach extensively across the country, he has written a book about avoiding personal sabotage and he’s ready to talk about the so-called scandal; and he has done so in an interview conducted by Jamie Foster Brown in the October 2010 edition of Sister 2 Sister magazine
.
According to Mrs. Foster-Brown it took a while for her and Pastor Bryant to get together to talk about his alleged sexual affair and “fall from grace,” but eventually they were able to arrange a sit down conversation at her home in Maryland.
Admittedly the interview displays all the charisma, complexity, brilliance, and wit that we’ve come to expect from Jamal Bryant. During their conversation he admits that he had an affair with a woman while being married but he adamantly denies claims that he impregnated the unnamed woman and that he was sexually involved with several women. According to Bryant there was “one woman. Not several. Not 10. And there is no baby anywhere…..there is no subpoena for me to go anywhere. I am not rolling up my sleeve for any blood test. My issue was infidelity against my wife.”
In addition, Bryant also admitted that in the beginning he was in absolute denial about the affair and when he finally decided to come clean to his wife it was already too late. He goes on in the interview to describe how distraught he was about the whole situation. He shares candidly about how his experience of depression and embarrassment left him wanting to leave ministry. Perhaps most telling is his admission that his father Bishop John Bryant called him during the heat of the controversy and told him that “he has never had this kind of pain and disappointment in his life.” Among other topics discussed in the interview were Bryant’s kids and their reaction, his affection and admiration for his ex-wife Giselle, the state of his congregation, his book World War Me
, his reality television appearances, and other interesting personal details of his life.
What We Should Learn From Bryant’s Admission
Though I am in no way celebrating or condoning Bryant’s actions I think he is to be commended for his admission of infidelity. Too many times our leaders feel the need to hide their indiscretions for fear that negative public perception will bring an end to their perceived success. Obviously, Bryant was not immune to this fear since it has taken him some time to come clean. Whatever the case, his courage to speak out about his situation has the potential to be a teaching moment for those willing to listen. In my assessment I think we can learn at least (2) important things from his admission.
To begin with I think we can learn that the celebrity preacher culture that we have created can be extremely problematic. To be sure, there have always been widely popular preachers like Justin Marytr and John CHRYSOSTOM in the early church, Martin Luther and John Calvin during the Reformation, Jonathan Edwards and Charles Finney during the revivalist era, Aimee Simple McPherson and Billy Sunday in the early 20th century, and Martin Luther King Jr., Billy Graham, and T.D. Jakes
etc., in recent times. Interestingly, the current culture of Christian superstardom is exacerbated with the formation of advanced forms of media that have the potential to make our preachers even more larger than life. This fact presents significant challenges for popular preachers because their personal lives have become even larger targets for both admiration and accusation. Also their high visibility creates a Christian celebrity culture that promotes a harmful perception of Christian ministry among clergy of all levels of influence.
According to Bryant, the celebrity preacher status caused him to think that he “was beyond a chink in the armour.” In other words, he felt like he was beyond getting caught. One wonders how individuals ever come to believe that they won’t get caught after having witnessed numerous individuals (like Jimmy Swaggert, Ted Haggard, and Bill Clinton etc.) have their indiscretions plastered all over the television and the internet.
The unfortunate reality is the more confident or successful we become, the more we believe we are in control of destiny, not realizing that no one is truly the captain of their ship. Moreover, what is most unfortunate is the potential danger of making someone a celebrity preacher who is not gone through a process of becoming a healthy leader. Bryant accentuates this point when he states “one of the most dangerous things is to become a celebrity when you’re sick because it will further antagonize what your issues are.” To be sure, no leader (celebrity or otherwise) is perfect, but there is such a thing as a healthy leader. I define a healthy leader as someone who is responsible enough to handle the pressures and temptations of being followed. The unfortunate reality is that often individuals are exalted to high visibility as a result of their gifts and not their health or spiritual maturity; too often this scenario becomes a recipe for disaster.
Bryant’s most powerful admission about the perils of celebrity preacher culture is related to perceptions of success in the so-called black church. According to Bryant, “success in black church circles is defined as having thousands of members, preaching at national conferences, and driving a Bentley and living on the water.” As someone who has been in ministry for 10 plus years I have to concur with Bryant’s assessment of success in mainstream ministry culture. Far too many individuals enter ministry with aspirations of being successful rather than with the conviction to be faithful. Furthermore, when the measure of success is money, cars, homes, and hoes--it turns preachers into celebrities and not servants. Commendably Bryant admits that in the process of becoming a Christian celebrity “preaching became his profession and not his lifestyle” and as a result he “lost his grounding.” Hopefully, this admission will teach good church folks not to celebrate ministers simply for their preaching persona and charisma but also to celebrate them for the quality of their service to others.
One way we can combat the perils of celebrity preacher culture is to stop perpetuating the male-masculinity cult among certain clergy. This is the group that views ministerial authority as a parade of people with penises sanctioned by God to bear witness to a Power that they deny the power of. This is the group that preaches divine liberation but practices religious bondage of women and other disenfranchised groups. This is the group that publically commends relational fidelity and chastity of singleness but privately condones irresponsible sexual habits among fellow male ministerial colleagues. I have personally witnessed this gender cult ruin many young men who enter ministry with good intentions and this is why I hope we learn this lesson about celebrity preacher culture from Bryant’s situation.
Finally, the last thing I think we can learn from Bryant’s admission of infidelity is that a culture of constructive critique is needful in Christian culture, especially since powerful Christian leaders rarely surround themselves with individuals whom they trust to tell them the truth about themselves. When bloggers (like myself) first posted the news of Bryant’s alleged fidelity three years ago after it was published in the Baltimore Sun supporters of Pastor Bryant inundated the comment sections of our blogs with “not so holy” indignation. I remember persons lecturing me about the virtue of praying for our leaders and not engaging in slander of “men of God.” Also, I remember having personal conversations with individuals who felt Bryant’s alleged moral failings were not important because “the deeds of a good man far outweigh any of his indiscretions.” And of course, there were those among the congregation of blind allegiance who categorized every critique of Bryant and his congregation as indications of jealousy and preacher player hating. Honestly, at the time I personally did not feel the need to respond to such short sided and provincial reactions.
However, now that Bryant has admitted his infidelity and critiqued the very system of preacher celebrity culture that he insists provided the context for his indiscretions, I cannot help but lift up the value of unpopular countercultural Christian critique. Sadly, had the court of popular opinion prevailed Bryant may have never come to realize the error of his ways. In the article Bryant tellingly admits that he “initially was in complete denial, but pressure from blogs and newspapers” caused him to have to be honest with his wife about his wrongdoings and as a result he learned a lesson from his situation.
Obviously, I’m not suggesting that any leader’s personal life should be made the topic of public gossip sessions at the public’s kitchen table so to speak. However, I am suggesting that certain individuals in the Christian community need to become more enlightened witnesses and realize the necessity of developing a critical discerning eye that can tell the difference between bold discipleship and blind devotion.
Thank goodness there were some enlightened witnesses out there raising their voices in the spirit of compassionate critique because as a result a gifted young pastor has grown and reconnected with a lost part of himself as a leader. And as Christian leader myself I can only hope that individuals will continue to remind us of our responsibility to be healthy leaders and when we sometimes fail at this task I hope we’ll have the courage to be as honest as Pastor Jamal Bryant. In the end analysis I commend Bryant for his soulful admission, I continue to hope the best for his ex-wife Giselle and the children and I pray we as leaders have been reminded of the burden of leadership.
Compassionately and Critically yours, Billy Michael Honor
The only reason these stories spread faster than the ones of where pastor's "demonstrate levels of high moral character, contrition, and/or personal transformation" is because that is what pastor's are suppose to do. They are supposed to display that level of character; it’s the standard, the norm so it isn't news. It's news when they do the opposite because people expect higher from them (which is something that anyone that is in that position knows without it being said) and they're usually preaching to the pulpit about it (i. e being faithful, honest, etc.) every Sunday. I'm sure he had plenty sermons on infidelity, lies, and faithfulness while he was being hypocritical and doing the opposite. While its admirable that he took responsibility for his actions and admitted what he did (which is IMO between him and his wife), I found it interesting that he tried to make it seem like just because it was 1, it was better than sleeping with 10. Whether its 1 or 50x times a sin is a sin, you don't get less points for singular or plural. At the end of the day, he is no more than a man but hopefully the next time around, he can resist things of this world, and follow the path he has chosen.
*sidenote* I can’t believe you quoted Lip Stick Alley LOL as your gossip source.
Posted by: Alexis | December 11, 2010 at 10:29 AM
@Alexis,
Though I agree that high levels of integrity should be the norm for all pastors. I don't think that is reason enough not to commend pastors for publically admitting their shortcomings. In my view, we can hold pastors accountable for their deeds and acknowledge when they corrected their improper course.
Also, since I'm not a member of Empowerment Temple I won't speak about the content of Pastor Bryant's sermons and I'll leave it at that. And I agree that committing adultery with one woman is not necessarily better than committing it with 10 but I don't think that was his point. In my reading, he was simply trying to clarify the facts from the various stories in the public sphere.
Lastly,why can't you believe I quoted Lick Stick Alley? Is it not a gossip site? I could have listed others but honestly they were the most aggressive in their criticism of Bryant.
Posted by: The Critical Cleric | December 12, 2010 at 06:26 PM
All Pastor's should be held accountable and I believe more accountable then the folks in the pews. I mean aren't they the experts of the book?
Posted by: Kingdom | December 16, 2010 at 09:00 PM
@Kingdom...no, all pastors aren't experts of the bible (assuming the bible is what you mean by "the book").
But even if one is a so-called expert concerning scripture that doesn't necessarily mean that they will be any more moral and/or integritous than someone who is not an expert. It is possible to acquire knowledge and not be changed by it.
Moreover, pastors should be held accountable because they represent One greater than themselves not because they are "experts of the book".
Posted by: The Critical Cleric | December 16, 2010 at 10:13 PM
I am sad to hear that another pastor have fallen and another divorce has taken place with our leadership. I will continue to pray for our leadership.
Posted by: Denise Tucker | November 03, 2011 at 06:45 PM
my ex husband is a beautiful man who I will forever love. he will always be a Man before a Minister or a Pastor. He is married again because that significance makes him reputable and eligible for the recognition he needs as Trustworthy and Reliable and what Appears Stable to the Masses. He loves preaching and helping people I know its his first love. He still however struggles everyday with infidelity and blurring the lines of his POSITION as a man of Integrity. I know this must be true for other men. I am not guessing, I know because I am his temptation, I keep myself Out of sight and understand that I do not want be his weakness and I, Have chosen Not to allow his fall from grace be.
Posted by: Crisp Mens Shirts Attract Me | March 18, 2012 at 02:01 PM
Jamal Bryant is living with ex wife. He's a fraud and a disgrace to the Body of Christ. Gizelle is no better. She's a "gold digger" and all about the $$$$$.
Posted by: 1luvGOD | May 24, 2012 at 10:07 PM
No one is perfect and who are we to judge? There is only one judge and that is GOD! If you read you would know that many men of GOD fell prey to adultery. Even David and he was a man after God's own heart. If we focus more on God and God's word we would Love one another as we love ourselves. Trust and believe Love covers a multitude of sins. In order to be forgiven by God we must be willing to forgive others. May God Bless us all
Posted by: Nancy Williams | June 26, 2012 at 01:33 AM
Adultery is rampant in so many churches. It’s a sure sign that the Apostate Church is ripe for judgment.
The early Church that started in the baptism of Holy Ghost and fire in 33 AD, has since descended into the Apostate Church we have today in 2012!
How did this happen?
For in the early Church, if you lied you died!
“But Peter said, Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie…You have not lied to men but to God.”
“Then Ananias, hearing these words, fell down and breathed his last. So great fear came upon all those who heard these things.” [Acts 5:3-5]
Becoming a Christian in the early Church was serious business. People really had to count the cost!
If you got drunk during the Lord’s Supper you got sick and also died.
“…he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgement to himself…for this reason…many sleep [die].” [1Cor.11:29,30]
I guess all these dead Christians didn’t know that all there sins, past, present and future had been washed in the blood!
I guess they didn’t know that if only they put their faith in the death of Christ on the cross, God wouldn’t see all their lying and drunkenness!
They didn’t know these things because these false doctrines didn’t exist in the early Church!
All these Christians died in this present dispensation of grace!
As Pastors started teaching that our deeds have nothing to do with our relationship with the Lord, the Holy Spirit and the fire of God, began to withdraw from the Church.
Since then, false teachings have increased tremendously over the past 1,900+ Years
Now we have fornicators, adulterers and homosexuals in the pulpit and no one bats and eye!
The Apostate Church is made up of all those who believe in God, read the Word, listen to sermons, attend the Lord’s Supper; but who also regard as permissible acts of adultery, homosexuality, stealing, lies, revenge and hatred.
While claiming to believe in God, they give no thought to sinning against Him!
Now the Lord is about to to start His Millennium Church, but first He’s going to
completely destroy the Apostate Church.
Posted by: OLA | July 14, 2012 at 07:22 PM
I am a friend of the of the young girl that was believed to be Pastor Jamal's Bryants mistress. At the time she was 16 years old when the affair started. (16 a minor) What people don't know is she is now 23 with a child by the pastor. He pays her child support etc to keep her quite. My friends aunt tried several times to bring the case to court. My friend still has received the confidence to come out against him. I am saddened everyday to know what my friend has been through. She now is a single mother, and a wonderful mother. She has cut me off since I told her I would speak out against it. In my eyes this is rape. My friend was pregnant at 16 and had her baby by 17. I want this to come to and end and win justice for my friend.
Posted by: Marie | July 24, 2012 at 09:44 PM
Sorry for my misspellings. My friend has NOT received the confidence to speak out. She has chosen to remain silent and NOT speak out about the situation at all. Many from his church don't believe their pastor would do such as thing. Well here is the proof. Im not bashing the pastor but something needs to be done before someone else's child becomes a victim.
Posted by: Marie | July 24, 2012 at 09:52 PM
Sis Marie,
If you have all of this info why do you conceal it. Eventually the baby should know who the daddy is and the sooner the better. To bad you are not woman enough to tell the story and leave it at that. The truth will set you and me free. Don't come online and talk about it be about it. It is obvious you have a guilty conscious and need to vent. I'm not trying to be mean but just saying what kind of friend are you, really?
Posted by: Bro Donald | February 24, 2013 at 06:26 AM
At the end of the day (or the age rather) all men will stand before the Holy God and give an account for every thought, word and deed.
My problem is with the church, why are they still allowing this man to stand up in the pulpit and spit hypocrisy? Does anyone know how to STAND for GOD these days, and not man?
Posted by: K.J. | May 13, 2013 at 01:52 PM
Wow! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It's on a completely different topic but it has pretty much the same layout and design. Wonderful choice of colors!
Posted by: boilers | September 26, 2013 at 06:48 AM
These are genuinely great ideas in about blogging. You have touched some good factors here. Any way keep up wrinting.
Posted by: stairlifts | October 01, 2013 at 05:00 PM
Greetings from Idaho! I'm bored at work so I decided to check out your site on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the knowledge you provide here and can't wait to take a look when I get home. I'm surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my mobile .. I'm not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, superb site!
Posted by: franking machine | October 03, 2013 at 12:20 PM
PASTOR BRYANT IS A GIFTED SPEAKER AND PREACHER. HE OBVIOUSLY WAS WELL BROUGHT UP YES HE FAILED, YES HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER, YES HE SINNED BUT HE DID NOT SIN AGAINST US BUT AGAINST GOD YES HE LET HS FAMILY DOWN. THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED FORGIVENESS. WE ARE NOT THE LORD JESUS THAT DIED FOR BRYANT. IT IS NOT OUR BLOOD THAT WAS SHED. I CHOOSE TO KEEP WATCHING HIM ON TV AND TO CONTINUE TO RESPECT THE POWER OF GOD IN HS LIFE. HE IS MARRIED TO A GOD FEARING WIFE I SUPPOSE SHE DID THE RIGHT THING.
Posted by: ODION | July 19, 2014 at 06:12 PM
ANOTHER WAY OF LOOKING AT IT WHEN A PASTOR FALLS BY WAY OF SIN IS TO ASK WHO WAS NOT PRAYING? MAJORITY OF PEOPLE GO TO CHURCH TO BE FEED BUT SHOULDN'T THERE BE CHRISTIANS THAT HAVE BEEN FEED ENOUGH AND ARE NOW MATURE TO A POINT WHERE GOD SHOWS THEM WHO AND WHAT TO PRAY ABOUT? THIS SORT OF STORIES SHOULD BE A WAKE UP CALL FOR THE BODY OF CHRIST AS A WHOLE.
Posted by: ODION | July 19, 2014 at 06:19 PM